Avaleht BioInfokeskus Geenifoorum Meedia BioSPINNO Projektid Geenivaramu Geenikeskus KKK Lingid Sisukord
Artiklid Geenivaramust
Geenivaramust välismeedias
Biotehnoloogia uudised
Nädalaülevaated 2002
Nädalaülevaated 2003
Nädalaülevaated 2005
Nädalaülevaated 2006
Nädalaülevaated 2007
Geeniprojektid maailmas
Artiklid ja materjalid Geeniprojektidest
Ilmunud raamatud
Kõnelevad Geenid
Kuumad Geenid
Euroopa Nõukogu Inimõiguste ja Biomeditsiini Konventsioon
Geneetiliselt muundatud organismide keskkonda viimise seadus
Inimgeeniuuringute seadus
Geneetikaga seonduvad õigusaktid
Euroopa Nõukogu Inimõiguste ja Biomeditsiini Konventsiooni Inimese Kloonimist Keelustav Lisaprotokoll

Avaleht  »   Meedia   »   Artiklid Geenivaramust   »   Geenivaramust välismeedias Print Email
Geenivaramust välismeedias

Geenivaramust välismeedias

Estonian, British Databases Use "Opt-In" Policies

SCIENTISTS AROUND the world attempting similar genetic database projects have been watching DeCode's troubles closely, says Dr. Russ B. Altman, associate professor of genetics, medicine and computer science at the Stanford University Medical Center. Altman says that DeCode's public relations problems in Iceland made health database projects in other countries "more careful about the issue of privacy."

Other database projects include citizens in their databases based on consent that is informed (individuals must opt in) rather than presumed. That's the case with both the Estonian Genome Project Foundation, created by the government in 2001 to study the former Soviet republic's caucasian population—one that is more diverse than Iceland's—and the UK Biobank at the University of Manchester.

The UK Biobank, which aims to be the world's biggest resource for the study of nature and nurture in health issues by involving up to half a million participants, has also set up an ethics council to support research into ethical issues raised by the project and says it will allow "no exclusive access to [its database] by any one organisation or commercial company."

Efforts to reassure local populations have gone a long way. "I think that DeCode was already having sufficient troubles with public relations that the other efforts were more careful about the issue of privacy. Estonia seems to have gotten a system that people are happy with. The British effort seems to have addressed these issues satisfactorily," says Altman, who is a past president of the International Society for Computational Biology. "Although it might be a setback for DeCode, it might be a vindication of these other efforts and their approaches."

Allikas: CIO Magazine

 In English